NS environmental groups question Lower Churchill project

Province should consider cheaper alternatives first

Project would need over 1,300 km of new transmission lines

Project would need over 1,300 km of new transmission lines
  • Lower Churchill project would need over 1,300 km of new transmission lines

The Atlantic chapter of the Sierra Club and the Halifax-based Ecology Action Centre are calling on the provincial government to consider alternatives to the $6.2 billion Lower Churchill hydro project.

“It’s really hard to accept at face value that this is the best option on the table,” says Brennan Vogel of the EAC. “We need to see more clarity provided by government.” He adds that instead of the multi-billion-dollar Lower Churchill project, Nova Scotia should be looking at importing potentially cheaper hydro-electricity from Quebec while financing more community-based wind and solar projects here.

He says the provincial government and Nova Scotia Power seem intent on bringing in Lower Churchill power via expensive undersea transmission cables and exporting part of it to the US—a move that would boost power company profits.

“We know Nova Scotia has a monopoly electrical utility so, in the absence of competition to result in fairer prices for Nova Scotian ratepayers, we’re perhaps being left in the dark...as to what the best options on the table are for providing stable, secure, renewable electricity,” Vogel says.

Support The Coast

At a time when the city needs local coverage more than ever, we’re asking for your help to support independent journalism. We are committed as always to providing free access to readers, particularly as we confront the impact of COVID-19 in Halifax and beyond.

Read more about the work we do here, or consider making a donation. Thank you for your support!

Comments (8)

Add a comment

Add a Comment

Get more Halifax

The Coast Daily email newsletter is your extra dose of the city Monday through Friday. Sign up and go deep on Halifax.

Recent Comments