I would have appreciated a greater focus on the (lack of) parenting skills the author takes into question. Still, this is a truly impressive string of vulgarity. Respect.
I'm not anti-new-convention centre, but I agree that many important questions need to be asked (or more importantly, answered) prior to a $100-million comittment.
I love that the Globe and Mail pointed out that the PETA protesters ended up having their rally in front of a statue of Robbie Burns, a man who once wrote:
“Some hae meat and canna eat,
And some wad eat that want it,
But we hae meat and we can eat,
Sae the Lord be thankit."
Obviously what's missing is a "pan-handler code of ethics." One where a pan-handler is obligated to memorize the hundreds of faces they solicit in the course of a day so they don't make the dreaded, "second ask," and end up enraging a prospective donor that has already told them, "no."
Or, maybe you should be content in the knowledge that it's them and not you that sees begging for people's pocket change as the only way to create an income.
If you don't want to give don't, but resist the urge to extol your moral superiority and self-righteous indignation at the fact that some people in this world do what they need to do to get by.
Recent Comments
Just checkin'.
“Some hae meat and canna eat,
And some wad eat that want it,
But we hae meat and we can eat,
Sae the Lord be thankit."
Or, maybe you should be content in the knowledge that it's them and not you that sees begging for people's pocket change as the only way to create an income.
If you don't want to give don't, but resist the urge to extol your moral superiority and self-righteous indignation at the fact that some people in this world do what they need to do to get by.
Tim sites Chris Power as "crowing," while Linda Power "says" things.
As "dar" says, "They both bullshit each other to get what they want. It's called collective bargaining."
Ultimately, the employees win, regardless of Tim's not-so-subtle bias.