Pin It

2010 grade: C
2009 grade: C-

Lorelei Nicoll is friendly to a fault, which is starting to become a problem: I’ve yet to hear her raise her voice in angry disagreement, or give that passionate speech that stakes out a clear position, detractors be damned. Her natural instinct is to position herself exactly in the centre of every debate, all sides having valid points, everyone with a need for accommodation.

A telling Nicoll moment came during the recent budget debate, during the committee of the whole vote for the package. COW votes are less structured than council votes, and when the mayor was counting the “yes” votes, Nicoll put her hand up, then down, then kind of held it in the middle, a “maybe” vote. When it came time to count the “no” votes, she did the same thing. As I wrote in my notes, and as several TV viewers immediately confirmed via Twitter, Nicoll had voted both “yes” and “no” on the budget. (She subsequently voted “yes” for the recorded council vote.)

Nicoll voted against the “tax reform” proposal, both at the East Harbour Community Council and at council (although she appeared to waver a bit after the EHCC vote). For that, she gets bumped up a tad from last year’s grade but, if she is to do better, she needs to demonstrate increased confidence and forthright political positions.

Pin It


Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Tim Bousquet

Survey Asks

Should council use the yet-to-be-finalized Centre Plan when debating new developments?

  • No, it doesn’t exist yet and is still likely to change
  • Yes, thousands of hours of work and consultation have gone into what’s already assembled
  • Maybe, it really depends on what’s being proposed by the developer
  • I don’t know what the Centre Plan is and do not wish to participate in this poll

View Results

Coast Top Ten

Reality Bites

More »


More »

In Print This Week

Vol 25, No 25
November 16, 2017

Cover Gallery »

Real Time Web Analytics

© 2017 Coast Publishing Ltd.