Pin It
Favourite

Flame blame 

Tear-jerking sentimentality aside, the Olympics are all about 
politics.

One World, One Dream? Oh China, you had me at One.


Not because I love the People’s Republic, per se. But because I love the Olympics. Anywhere. Anytime.


I’ve got a 100-percent buy-in with the touchy-feely, smushy-wooshy, shiny-happy-people vibe the modern games sell. I get verklempt just thinking about the opening ceremonies. Björk in that crazy-trained dress that unfurled to cover all the athletes at the 2004 opener in Greece? I’m all over that shit.


And there’s no irony here, in case you’re looking at these words with narrowed eyes. I love that sentimental, it-takes-a-village, Parade-of-Nations stuff. It just gets to me. When Halifax was vying for the Commonwealth Games, this was my take: how much money? Bah! Whatever. We’ll find it somewhere. Now, you, old white guy in the suit, hand me one of those flags to wave!


So it pains me to admit it, but I have to tell you: this will be the last Olympic torch run. 


China is red phosphorus when it comes to controversy, but the world has problems with England too, where the 2012 games are scheduled. The Olympic torch barely made its way through London April 6; 2,000 on-foot, airborne, bike and river cops protected the flame and still it was grabbed by one protester and almost extinguished by
two others.


The International Olympic Committee says it will review the torch relay and the London Games organizers, whose successful bid included plans for an international “journey of hope and reconciliation,” are now talking about a domestic-only torch relay.


See, everyone knows now how much attention screwing with the torch run can garner. Get a banner and hurl yourself in the way of the flame and you’ve got automatic exposure. The torch marathon is dead in the water.


But don’t think of this as the demise of an ancient tradition. As Gwynne Dyer reminded readers in his syndicated column last week, the first torch run only dates to 1936. It was a Nazi invention, designed for 3,442 racially pure Aryan joggers to help celebrate Hitler’s Olympic debutante ball.


Make-believe history or not, I hate to see the torch relay go. Remember Muhammad Ali as the surprise final torch bearer in 1996, running in to Atlanta’s Olympic Stadium to light the cauldron? That’ll never happen again. But as much as I will miss the spectacle of the relay, I love that the Olympic flame has come into its political own.


Because everything---everything---is 
political. 


Buying Alberta beef for Sunday dinner
is political.


Riding the bus to work is political.


Enrolling your kids in private school
is political.


Buying birth control pills is political.


And the Olympic Games, by virtue of its dealings with so many national political entities, may be the most political enterprise on planet Earth.


Athletes don’t agree, of course. We hear their pleas every time there’s mention of an Olympic boycott or a planned protest: don’t punish us. For god’s sake don’t politicize
the games.


And I sympathize. I really do. Because I can only imagine what it must be like to train eight hours a day for a decade to reach the Olympics, going to school or holding down a day job at the same time (because Sport Canada’s Athlete Assistance Program can only give top-level athletes $18K a year) only to have your life’s ambitions overshadowed by some foaming-at-the-mouth protester with a made-in-China “I HATE CHINA” t-shirt.


But no matter the strain of training, no matter the Olympic Charter designation of the games as existing “to place sport at the service of humanity and thereby to promote peace,” no matter those yet-to-be-aired Nike commercials that are bound to all that is holy and global (and will, guaranteed, have me welling up and sniffling even on their 100th repeat over the 17 days of play), the games are political.


Because politics imbibes every choice we make. It is our living and our breathing. And that’s precisely because we don’t live and breathe in vacuums. But more than that. It was a deeply political choice for the IOC to award the games to China in the first place.


Kevan Gosper, Deputy Chair of the IOC, wrote in an editorial in the Melbourne Herald Sun on the weekend that, “By awarding China the Games in 2001 the IOC showed it believed the Olympic Games could contribute to China’s process of opening up and engaging with the world.”


And if that’s not political, I don’t know what is.

Pin It
Favourite

Latest in Lowefiles

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Survey Asks

Should council use the yet-to-be-finalized Centre Plan when debating new developments?

  • No, it doesn’t exist yet and is still likely to change
  • Yes, thousands of hours of work and consultation have gone into what’s already assembled
  • Maybe, it really depends on what’s being proposed by the developer
  • I don’t know what the Centre Plan is and do not wish to participate in this poll

View Results

Coast Top Ten

Reality Bites

More »

Shoptalk

More »

In Print This Week

Vol 25, No 25
November 16, 2017

Cover Gallery »


Real Time Web Analytics

© 2017 Coast Publishing Ltd.