Or there's this school of thought: men are predisposed to spreading their seed far and wide. Women are predisposed to finding a mate who will provide the best situation for offspring.
Doesn't this just smack of someone who feels it's their god given duty to teach other drivers a lesson? Slowing down to 60k's on a highway? Who else the fuck does that? Maybe bikerdude was up your ass because you were driving too slow for the pace of traffic and he was just waiting for the break in traffic in the next lane so he could pass. Maybe he is just a tailgater. Still don't give you the right to be a self-appointed traffic warden. Or maybe 60k is your normal highway speed in which case YOU are the hazard.
Women should have the right to make choices about their own bodies. It seems so simple on the surface, deciding to terminate a pregnancy. But what is a pregnancy? It is the start of life. Modern technology allows a 3D view inside the womb where we see a living, thriving, developing human being. Legally, a woman has the right to "terminate a pregnancy". It has become convenient to apply a whitewashed term for an act which is essentially about ending the life another human being. If the mother chooses this option immediately after the child emerges from the womb there is a different legal outcome. There is little distinguishable difference. Whether inside or outside the mother's body it is still a human being. Society condemns the actions of deadbeat dads who abandon their children, but sanctions mothers who do so at a most fundamental and crucial time, during that of the child's development. I agree, it is a woman's right to make choices about her own body. Opting to kill another human being, one's own child, says a lot about the character of a woman who would make the choice to end another's life. Women in Ontario also have another right with regard to their bodies -to go topless in public, but concern about their character means very few, if none, actually do.
Recent Comments
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/05/17/nude-…