AcadianPrince | Halifax, Nova Scotia | THE COAST

Member since May 7, 2010

Contributions:

  • Posted by:
    AcadianPrince on 12/02/2015 at 10:40 PM
    Once again the journalistic integrity of the the Coast comes into question. You neatly sneak in that the two charges that this headline blasts, were not tested in a court of law yet you make it very evident of the the writers opinion, with no evidence of their own, save for a third party video made by a group of rabble rousers. As a former resident for 3 years of the accused house, I find this whole piece to be slanderous and terribly amateur. As a heads up a resident does not mean a member, so my bias is from my experience being not associated and just paying rent. I witnessed countless women overly imbibe and the brothers will find their friend/s and get them into a cab to get home. I have witnessed brothers be attacked for defending incapacitated women.

    Again, this is why I use theCoast now mostly to clean my glass, and to sop up my puppies accidents. DO SOME JOURNALISM!
  • Posted by:
    AcadianPrince on 05/08/2013 at 6:44 AM
    I'll tell you what, I will give A metre as that what is demanded by law, as long as I don't see anybody riding their bikes on the sideWALK or the crossWALK.
  • Posted by:
    AcadianPrince on 05/08/2013 at 6:30 AM
    Re: “The usual suspects
    So you are making a mountain out of a mole hill... I don't care what colour a person is so long as they are qualified for the job. The idea of putting someone into a position that is not the best candidate for the job, but is a visual minority, is an insult to the position that needs to be filled, and for the minority because you are saying that there needs to be special treatment in order for them to get anywhere? What does "special case" segregation do out side of grow animosity?

    Oh the writings of an over opinionated fool who reads too much of his own writing.
  • Posted by:
    AcadianPrince on 05/07/2010 at 2:29 PM
    I'm sorry, but I find this article to be both useless, and detrimental to improving our cities economic health.

    At what point is any of the "discovered" censored information ground breaking, or important?

    Any cost estimate includes Hotel and office space. This isn't just a convention centre, it is an important cog in the economic engine of NS. It may not be the savior of DT Halifax, but it will definitely improve the businesses in the area, when built. I quote a peer saying this, "To be against this project, is to be against economical development."

    Why be inflammatory over a project, that we need to have followed through on?