Pin It
Favourite

Monday, April 11, 2016

Here’s the latest proposed look for the Nova Centre

Changes to $500-million complex going before Design Review Committee this week.

Posted By on Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:00 AM

The view from Sackville and Market Street of the newly-modified Nova Centre. - VIA ARGYLE DEVELOPMENTS
  • via Argyle Developments
  • The view from Sackville and Market Street of the newly-modified Nova Centre.

There's finally a clear picture of those design changes being proposed for the Nova Centre.

In March, the as-yet-finalized changes to the $500-million complex caught the municipality and the public by surprise when a vague description appeared on an information item that was supposed to go before HRM’s Design Review Committee. That meeting was cancelled over a lack of agenda items.


Argyle Developments owner Joe Ramia has been planning for exterior design changes to the towering downtown project since September, 2015, according to the information report. But no one seemed to have any concrete details on what exactly those proposed modifications were. 



Well, now we know. The new design includes 14 alterations to multiple elements of the Nova Centre’s base and tower, as listed below:

click to enlarge screen_shot_2016-04-10_at_5.21.52_pm.png

If approved, the changes would turn the Nova Centre from this:

click to enlarge screen_shot_2016-04-10_at_5.25.35_pm.png

Into this:

screen_shot_2016-04-10_at_5.25.54_pm.png


Speaking of the Nova Centre’s design; over the weekend the Willow Tree community group posted a blog illustrating all the photo tricks those pretty architectural renderings use to sell the public on new developments (particularly the Nova Centre). Those methods include, but are not limited to, cropping out neighbouring structures, manipulating light and the kind of Photoshopping more commonly found on glossy magazine covers.

“A striking formal composition is what architects call ‘the killer view’: the one we’d buy on postcards. To achieve this, some liberties may be necessary. In all of the images above, we’re stationed a quarter-mile away, so Nova Centre fits within a 60-degree cone of vision and doesn’t appear monstrously distorted. Of course, this view wouldn’t be possible without tearing down another city block in the foreground.

Architectural renderings are often composed as bird’s-eye views. Who wouldn’t want to be a bird, soaring through the city and looking down? Meanwhile, our human-eye view is at street level, looking up, so it’s fair to ask why that viewpoint wasn’t included in the renderings.”

The original design for the Nova Centre was approved back in 2014, but due to the “length of time that has passed” since and the extent of these proposed modifications by Ramia, HRM staff have recommended a new substantive site plan and round of public notification is needed before the changes can be approved.


A public open house on the proposed modifications will take place Monday, Wednesday night, 7-9pm, at the Cambridge Suites (1583 Brunswick Street). The Design Review Committee will then hear a preliminary presentation for amending the Nova Centre’s site plan on Thursday, April 14.

Tags: , , ,

Survey Asks

Women are boycotting Twitter in protest of how the social network has ignored abuse directed at its members. What should men boycott?

  • Comment sections
  • Mansplaining
  • 20 percent of their salaries
  • Systemic inequality and aggressive patriarchal dominance creating a culture of abuse and harassment towards women.
  • Dick pics

View Results

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

Remember, it's entirely possible to disagree without spiralling into a thread of negativity and personal attacks. We have the right to remove (and you have the right to report) any comments that go against our policy.

Coast Top Ten

Opinionated

More »

Reality Bites

More »

Shoptalk

More »

In Print This Week

Vol 25, No 20
October 12, 2017

Cover Gallery »


Real Time Web Analytics

© 2017 Coast Publishing Ltd.