Pin It
Favourite

We ask a lot from a toilet 

To the editor,

Boiling down the entire "No place to go" article into a few requirements, it seems we want:

Male, female and unisex (family) facilities at each location; more stalls in male washrooms to accommodate "shy bladder" users; female facilities at least twice as numerous/large as male facilities; all stalls larger to accommodate barrier-free access, strollers and overweight users; clean; well-lit; not locked but safe; no attendants; free (taxpayer-funded); plentiful; attractive; 24-hour operation; easy street access; no stairs; changing tables provided; step-stools for children; hooks for coats, purses, and backpacks; interesting; "cool" (not just functional); extensive signage; immune to vandalism, graffiti, theft, littering and abuse.

Perhaps not so easy, we also want these more difficult targets: to accommodate those who want "to pray; to cry, to think and be quiet; to escape from the city of man," without causing lineups; available to the homeless, but not to drug users, sleepers or vagrants.

Can we have all of this and keep costs in line with Shanghai: $1.80 per person in the population (or roughly $650,000 for HRM) to provide one bathroom every 300 metres? Perhaps construction costs/wages are lower in Shanghai than in Halifax, even though toilets are more plentiful.

How about we shoot for something a little more down-to-earth, like one barrier-free unisex stall every five blocks in the downtown areas, and see if even that limited target is achievable?

By David G. Smith

Pin It
Favourite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Coast Top Ten

Opinionated

More »

Reality Bites

More »

Shoptalk

More »

In Print This Week

Vol 24, No 51
May 18, 2017

Cover Gallery »


Real Time Web Analytics

© 2017 Coast Publishing Ltd.