Bernard Prigent, Pfizer’s inside man

PM Harper's appointment of drug company's VP to Canadian Institutes of Health Research is also a registered lobbyist… to CIHR.

by Tim Bousquet

Last October, the Harper government appointed Bernard Prigent to the governing council of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the federal agency that distributes about a billion dollars annually for health research. That appointment was met with near-universal condemnation from medical ethicists, because Prigent is a vice-president of Pfizer Canada, a firm that stands to profit from the decisions made at CIHR.

"There's a structural conflict of interest," explains Jocelyn Downie, the Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy at Dalhousie University. "On the one hand, it's [Prigent's] statutory duty to represent the best health interests of Canadians, and on the other hand, as an executive with Pfizer, he's legally bound to promote the profit interests of his company. Those competing interests will not always align, and will sometimes be in conflict."

Prigent's appointment was all the more remarkable because just a month before, Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion in the United States, the largest criminal fine ever assessed in that country, for fraudulently marketing the arthritis drug Bextra for unapproved uses.

Prigent's appointment resulted in an extraordinary review by the parliamentary standing committee on health, but it was not reversed.

But the parliamentary committee did not have a crucial piece of evidence: not only is Prigent a vice president of Pfizer, but he is also a registered lobbyist for Pfizer. That information is only now coming to light, and has never been previously reported. According to the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada, the government agency that regulates lobbyists, Prigent's position as Pfizer lobbyist is to sway policy at the "Canadian Institute of Health Researchers (CIHR) and other Research Oriented Spending Programs as it relates to private/public research and development partnerships," and Prigent is to achieve these aims through both oral and written techniques.

In other words, Prigent the Pfizer lobbyist is paid to lobby Prigent the CIHR official.

Federal rules require that lobbyists file monthly reports about "oral and arranged communications relating to a contract regardless of who initiated the communication," but Prigent has not filed such a report.

Prigent did not respond to a request for comment.

Comments (6) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 6

Add a comment | All comments »

I think that the Canadians who would care about this are too busy caring about this same sort problem happening in the American government. While we fume and vent spleen at the American stlye of promoting people with interest conflicts our own government is taking the opportunity to do the same thing while everyone's head is turned.

Posted by Toothpick on February 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM | Report this comment

The big pharmas have far too much to say in the delivery of healthcare in this country as it is. To put one of their corporate executives in such an obvious conflict of interest position is insulting. It is not the business sense that I object to, that executives of large corporations bring to the table, to conduct affairs in a businesslike fashion on time and within budget. It's the shameful lack of ethics and the treatment of serious diseases solely as markets to be exploited that I can't accept in a public official. Unlike these Tory hacks and as a Liberal small business person I have respect for a dollar, I just don't worship it.

Posted by dr.barry on February 7, 2010 at 10:45 AM | Report this comment

Isn't this how pork barrelling works? It would be funny if it wasn't for the fact the conservatives weaseled their way into "power" by accusing others of doing the very same thing.

Posted by alsandor on February 4, 2010 at 5:37 PM | Report this comment

Are you trying to say that what's good for Pfizer isn't good for Canada?

Posted by MattAbroad on February 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM | Report this comment

Perhaps he should just de-register as a lobbyist or delete from his registration all references to CHIR.
If he has not filed monthly reports you may assume he did not conduct any communications 'relating to a contract...' or you may assume he is just late in filing.
I just wish Ms Downie and her ilk would just say they don't want any person with a business background on any board of a government agency.

Posted by Joeblow on February 4, 2010 at 2:36 PM | Report this comment

Read all 6 comments

Latest in News Feature

NEWS FEATURE »

Companies connected with Nova Scotia Business, Inc board member James Kehoe to receive $585,688 in rebates approved by NSBI.

posted by TIM BOUSQUET, Aug 19/10

comments 0

NEWS FEATURE »

Bawdy crimes

posted by LIZZY HILL, Aug 12/10

By redefining sex work as organized crime, the Conservatives are endangering workers. comments 7

NEWS FEATURE »

Blow job

posted by BRUCE WARK, Aug 5/10

Wind power is sold as the answer to Nova Scotia’s quest for renewable energy, but we’re overlooking the health effects on people who live near windmills, and some serious questions about whether wind can really solve our electrical problems. comments 28

NEWS FEATURE »

The accidental activist

posted by LEZLIE LOWE, Jul 22/10

In the 1970s, in a dress shop on Barrington Street, a straight salesperson provides professional and helpful service to Halifax’s emerging drag queen population. Is she a gay crusader, or just a decent person? Or are they the same thing? comments 2