Adams: Yes
Barkhouse: No
Blumenthal: No
Dalrymple: No
Fisher: Yes
Harvey: No
Hendsbee: No
Hum: Absent
johns: No
Karsten: No
Kelly: Yes
Lund: No
McCluskey: Yes
Mosher: Yes
Nicoll: Yes
Outhit: No
Rankin: Absent
Sloane: Yes
Smith: Yes
Streatch: No
Uteck: Absent
Walker: No
Watts: Yes
Wile: No
Final vote:
Yes- 9
No- 12
Motion fails
Showing 1-3 of 3
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**************~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HUM AND UTECK...ABSENT
MUST HAVE BEEN OUT SPENDING THE MONEY THEY'RE GOING TO SAVE ON TAXES.
~***~ UNFAIR TO TAXPAYERS ~***~
It figures that some councillors would be against this or not even show up to vote.
In my world if your a PUBLIC EMPLOYEE,( thats what these people are) you should have no secrets from the people that pay your cheque.
But looking at the list its not hard to understand why the people that voted no did it..
| ||||||
|