        
  Tweet
  
  Pin It
  
Share

« The dismal science | Hansen: Dion was right »

Monday, December 22, 2008

Guns for kids

Posted by Tim Bousquet on Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:46 AM

Tax credits for children's recreational expenses are mostly a political sop to middle class families, but so far as the tax credits actually increase physical activity among youngsters, it's hard to criticize them.

As the provincial Department of Health Promotion and Protectionexplains,

The tax credit, or healthy living incentive, provides an allowable tax credit of up to $500 per child to help with the cost of registering children and youth in sport or recreation activities that offer health benefits.

But what sort of recreational activities qualify? The complete list of authorized organizations shows organizations promoting such noncontroversial sports as skiing, baseball, football, hockey and the like. Other sports are less popular, but few would argue they don't fit the criteria of "offer health benefits": badminton, judo, the truly physically demanding (seriously) rope skipping, etc.

But then we get to these:

36. Nova Scotia Rifle Association
41.Shooting Federation of Nova ScotiaAnnapolis Valley Shooting Sports ClubAtlantic Marksmen AssociationCape Nova Rifle & Revolver ClubChignecto Handgun ClubChignecto Muzzle Loaders SocietyClare Shooters AssociationCumberland Marksmen AssociationHighland Gun ClubIPSC Nova ScotiaNorth Mountain Gun ClubNova Scotia Muzzle Loaders AssociationNova Scotia Rifle AssociationPictou County Military Rifle AssociationSt. Mary's Shooters AssociationScotia Sportsmen's Associationa

Forget the other public policy issues involved; what, precisely, is the "health benefit" of teaching kids to shoot? If there's even one piece of scientific evidence showing that children who know how to shoot guns are healthier than those who don't, I'm completely unaware of it. On the contrary, their risk of early death is increased several fold.

Survey Asks

Do you agree with Halifax's school board cutting 152 teachers?

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Wayne, surely you know that facts seldom trump left-wing political correctness in Mr. Bousquet's commentary.

report

dislike

Posted by Keith on 12/25/2008 at 4:00 AM

Tim, you did say that children who know how to shoot have their risk of early death multiplied several fold, so Wayne's interpretation was quite understandable. Your jump in logic from "shooting sports" to "outside gunplay" was not made explicit or written clearly. In any case, I agree with you, so no offense, OK?

report

dislike

Posted by Jammie on 12/23/2008 at 4:00 AM

If we're going to get rid of shooting sports because it's too dangerous, let's also exclude sports for children, then. After all, 242,000 children are injured from paying sports in Canada every year. As for health benefits, if Mr. Bousquet is unaware of the health benefits of competitive shooting, perhaps he should find out what they might be before assuming there are none. Try holding a rifle in your hands and hitting a target 100 yards away before degrading the sport.

report

dislike

Posted by Wayne on 12/22/2008 at 4:00 AM

I didn't say shooting sports are too dangerous. I said they don't promote health.An incident or two like the kid blowing his head off at the Ohio (I think) shooting range aside, I'm sure most shooting ranges are safe. It's gunplay outside the shooting ranges that isn't safe.

report

dislike

Posted by Tim Bousquet on 12/22/2008 at 4:00 AM

Subscribe to this thread:

By Email